Thanos Editing: Why and How

Editing sucks.

Right?

You spend all this time pouring words onto a page, cultivating the perfect descriptions and dialogue, explaining every detail of the story, leaving no corner of your world untouched. And then you look at your word count…

If you’re anything like me, you realize that the next several months is going to test your resolve, your eyesight, and the structural integrity of your coffee table. I can’t be the only person who gorilla-thumps nearby objects out of frustration, can I? After all, editing is difficult. You’re selectively tearing out pieces of a story you’ve created. It’s a mentally strenuous task with emotional weight behind it, and you’ll be doing it for months, at least.

If you’re familiar with my blog, you might recall that I recently turned down a publishing deal with a small press and went back to edit my manuscript yet again. I had “edited” before, and the fruits of those labors had cropped my 165,000-word-story down to 147,000. On this editing wave, my goal is to get below 120,000, preferably down to 110,000. I’m currently at 140,000 after editing the third chapter. Yes, I’ve cut 7000 words out of three (long) chapters.

I’m seeing things I couldn’t see before. I'm deleting entire paragraphs, huge chunks of dialogue. Condensing twelve lines down to two. Why am I able to do this now, when I wasn’t able to before?

Distance.

The first time(s) I edited Sundering, I had taken a month off beforehand.

Now, it’s been six months since I had last worked on the story.

That distance allows me to see everything with greater clarity. I can be brutal with my edits because I’m not as close to the story as I used to be. Sure, I wish I could keep it all in. But I can’t. That word count doesn’t look good to agents, and I know I can tighten the story. And having that zoomed-out perspective allows me to distinguish the crucial from the unimportant.

So the first piece of advice I can give you is this: take more time off than you think you need. Work on other stuff. If you’re excited to edit, then wait. You’re still too into your own story.

This fresh-eyed approach has allowed me to cut almost a third of my words so far. That means a much smoother and faster reading experience and lower printing costs if I choose to self-publish. Below, I’ll discuss the two main strategies I use to Thanos my manuscript. If you haven’t seen Avengers: Infinity War, Thanos is a shockingly powerful villain who wipes out half the entire universe with a snap of his fingers. He’s pretty intense.

Here’s how you can do the same thing to your manuscript.

Two words: Cut and condense.

Cutting

Basic premise: if it doesn’t advance the story, it’s got to go.

Some stuff just doesn’t need to be in the story. It’s cool, it’s funny, it’s entertaining, it provides depth to the characters or shows something about the setting… But it’s just not necessary. These kinds of things are the hardest to cut. It can be a line of dialogue, a paragraph of description, a page of heavy-handed exposition, or an entire scene or chapter. But if it doesn’t move the story forward or provide some sort of crucial development, it can be cut.

I had to cut a meeting/conversation between two character who become very close later in the series, because the meeting did nothing for the immediate story. I also had to cut an entire fight I wanted to write because there was no point to it. These hard decisions will earn you 2000-5000 words every time you make them, which can be a saving grace for pitching your manuscript.

Ask yourself “what’s the point of this scene?” If you don’t have a good reason, give it the chop. And remember, “but I love it,” and “it’s so cool,” are not good reasons.

If you’re really struggling with whether or not to cut something, make a copy of your WIP, cut it, and come back for a read much later. If it stays smooth, leave it out. If it feels awkward, put it back in and find something else to cut, or condense the material by cutting the fluff and paring it down to the essentials.

That’s the nature of strategy number two:

Condensing

In my opinion, this is even more vital to editing than cutting, because no matter how much you cut, you’ll still be left with a story, and the pacing and delivery of that story need to be, in the words of Breaking Bad’s Tuco Salamanca…

tight-tight-tight-yeah.jpg

There are very few sentences and paragraphs that can’t be expressed more concisely. My first drafts are full of redundant phrasing, and while the information therein is important, it doesn’t need to be stated more than once.

What’s redundant phrasing? It can be something as simple as “she shrugged her shoulders.” Well yeah, what else would she shrug? Her knees? Also in this category are things like “he nodded his head,” and “she blinked her eyes.” If that last one sounds excessively stupid, that’s because it is.

It can be something that’s already implied, like “he screamed in terror.” Well, if some scary shit is happening and the character is screaming, we can assume he’s terrified. Now, there are times when the “in terror” adds flavor, structure or rhythm to the sentence, I get it. Just be aware that you can take it out, and that the reader will still know that your character is having a bad time.

The redundancies can also be long and complex. Consider the following paragraph:

She got dressed, pulling her shirt over her shoulders and smoothing out her hair. It was always so frizzy. She crossed the room, grabbed the doorknob, and pushed it open, making sure to lock the door behind her with the key that she then stuffed into her pocket. Padding down the hall, she glanced at the pictures on her left side, the family she once had, and felt that crushing sadness once again. They were gone, and that would never change.

That paragraph almost put me to sleep writing it. Who the fuck cares that she got dressed, walked across the room, put the key back into her pocket, etc? This isn’t that third-grade experiment about teamwork where you had to direct your partner to make a PB&J sandwich using only verbal cues, and if you skipped a step like “open the peanut-butter jar” or “pick up the spoon,” your partner just stood there looking like an idiot who couldn’t figure out that to scoop the peanut butter, they had to first pick up the jar and open it, even though it was technically your own fault for not following directions and GODDAMNIT JEFF, WHY DID YOU HAVE TO GO AND MAKE ME LOOK BAD?

Anywaaaaaays…

Let’s condense that above passage, removing all redundancy and implied actions.

She pulled her shirt over her shoulders and smoothed out her frizzy hair. As she exited the room, the door shut behind her with a haunting finality. She glanced at the pictures lining the hallway, the family she once had, and felt that crushing sadness once again. They were gone, and that would never change.

The first two sentences are condensed into one much shorter sentence. Hell, even that one can be cut, as it isn’t crucial unless you really want to let the reader know about the character’s frizzy hair. The second sentence is wholly unnecessary, so I just gutted it and added a small bit that adds some emotional weight instead of a mundane description of leaving the room. The important stuff is at the end, so that’s largely unchanged.

Now, that paragraph was purposefully written to be bad. So, let’s look at some examples from Sundering. In both cases, I thought these passages were good enough to make the “final cut,” before I realized my manuscript needed way more work.

Below is part of a conversation between two main characters. First is the long version, second is the condensed version. I’m pretty sure you’ll notice the difference.

Pre-Edit (365 words)

“I’m sorry,” Ryden mumbled, his bravado visibly deflated. “I didn’t mean to question what you’ve done for us. But I don’t understand why I don’t have a say in what my life is going to be.”

“Because that isn’t the nature of life. Life isn’t about self-serving choices and freedom of consequence, it’s about responsibility and duty. It’s about doing what’s right. Think of your future children. Do you want them to live? Remember, I lost four siblings in my youth.”

“Of course.”

“Do you want them to be well provided for? To never know hunger or desperation?” Rylar asked.

“Yes.”

“Do you want them to be protected from the criminals of the world? The thieves, the murderers, the rapists? They prey on those who cannot protect themselves.”

“Of course, I do.”

“Then your path is clear. Marrying the farmgirl will not give you those things. Becoming an artist will not give you those things. You would be voluntarily stepping down the ladder of power and influence after I clawed my way to the top to give you and your sister a chance to live a life of comfort,” Rylar said.

Ryden scoffed. “Why do you care so much about power and influence?”

“I have no desire to rule over others and dictate how they live their lives. You’ll notice we have only one servant, and I pay and treat him well. I don’t need to be ‘Lord Greyhart.’ I want you to be able to choose to be Lord Greyhart, because although you might not care to at the moment, you may change your mind later in life. And when you’re a modestly paid artist married to a commoner with no family influence, you will have no way to climb back up that ladder. Those opportunities will be too far gone, you will live a life of regret, and your children and all their children after them will pay the consequences of your short-sightedness. I know what I’m asking of you isn’t easy. But nothing worth doing is.”

Ryden sat against the wall and massaged his temples, taking a deep breath. “I know... I know you’re right, but I can’t deny how I feel.”

Post-Edit (111 Words)

“I’m sorry,” Ryden mumbled. “I didn’t mean to question what you’ve done for us. But still… I wish I had a choice.”

“Life isn’t about self-serving choices and freedom from consequence. It’s about responsibility and duty. It’s about doing what’s right. Think of your future children. Do you want them to live in comfort, to never know hunger or desperation?”

“Of course, I do.”

“Then your path is clear. Marrying the farmgirl will not give you those things. Becoming an artist will not give you those things.”

Ryden slumped against the wall, head down. “I know... I know you’re right, but I can’t deny how I feel. I love her, Father.”

The essence of those two passages is the exact same, only the first is three times as long. Some of my chapters are full of back-and-forth dialogue between characters, and though the dialogue eventually gets somewhere, “eventually” isn’t ideal for maintaining a reader’s interest. So you condense, over and over and over.

Until your eyeballs hurt.

But how? How do you choose what to take out and what to leave in?

For dialogue, I often ask myself “what is the TLDR (too long, didn’t read, which, in millennial speak, means ‘summary’) of each exchange?” What’s the outcome? And what is the quickest way to reach that outcome?

In the above section, Rylar originally asks his son three variants of the same question, which eats up six lines on the page. Then Ryden challenges him, and Rylar responds for an entire paragraph before the conclusion comes around. I condensed the three variants down a single question, and then removed the challenge, because in the end, that mini-exchange doesn’t change anything.

The above section is just one part of their long discussion, but after boiling several lines down to the vital bits multiple times over, I’m left with a chapter that’s 1000 words leaner. A book with 38 chapters that are each 1000 words leaner is a book that’ll read much smoother once the words are cut and the tears have dried.

Here’s another example, this one two descriptive paragraphs.

Pre-Edit (214 words)

Rylar rode back to Castle Elhan in the morning, anticipation clouding his ability to enjoy the new spring day with which Rossane had blessed them. The breeze was pleasant and the sun bright, but he felt a peculiar sourness, like something had spoiled inside him. Fatherhood seemed to be an unending exercise in indecision, one that made him long for the relative simplicity of military command. Had he shared too much with Ryden last night? Had he not said enough? And if this war came to fruition, what would it mean for his family?

The father in him wanted to keep Ryden as far from the conflict as possible. The commander in him was almost eager for his son to finally prove himself. However, since Ryden had not yet graduated his training, his involvement in any fighting would be unlikely, except in the most dire of circumstances. Rylar was glad the choice had essentially been made for him. Despite his words the previous night, he knew his son’s lineage did not make him invulnerable. He would never forgive himself if he were to send Ryden to his death, and yet, he knew he couldn't shelter him forever, not if his dreams of cementing the Greyhart legacy into Corbryn’s upper echelons was to be realized.


Post-Edit (158 Words)

Rylar rode back to Castle Elhan in the morning, his doubt spoiling the new spring day with which Rossane had blessed them. The breeze was pleasant and the sun bright, but he felt a peculiar sourness. The constant indecision of fatherhood made him long for the relative simplicity of military command. Had he shared too much with Ryden last night? Had he not said enough? And if this war came to fruition, what would it mean for his family?

The father in him wanted to keep Ryden as far from the conflict as possible. The commander in him was eager for his son to finally prove himself. Though Ryden hadn’t yet passed Vindication, it loomed closer by the day. Rylar held no illusions that if war came to Corbryn, his son would be spared from the fighting. He briefly reconsidered his course. For all his words the previous night, he knew the Greyhart name alone couldn’t protect Ryden.  


214 down to 158 is about a 25% reduction. Extrapolate that to a whole chapter and you’ll have a much tighter flow. Not every chapter will be equally reduced, of course. I’m pretty sure my earlier chapters are the most bloated, because I was trying to fit so much information in. Still, I was able to cut out a quarter of the language and keep 100% of the content.

This wasn’t achieved through obliterating any single sentence or phrase, but rather rearranging them to deliver the same information. Look out for words and phrases that mean the same thing or draw the same conclusion. Pick out the strongest parts and delete the rest. There’s no need to state anything more than once. Your readers are smart. This also gives your writing more punch, since your most vivid words won’t be surrounded by dull, empty ones.

Hopefully, by removing unnecessary sections of your work and condensing vital sections into extra crispy subsections, you can maintain control of your language, your word count, and most importantly, your story.

Be dispassionate. Be ruthless. Treat your story like you’ll make a dollar for every word you cut.

And remember, when your resolve weakens and your finger hovers over the “delete” key in a moment of emotion-driven paralysis, just ask yourself:

What would Thanos do?

The Type of Character Development Nobody Talks About

There's a novel I read this year called “The Knife.” You can read the full review here, but long story short: it's awesome. Not in a cool, fun, “yeah, totally awesome, bro!” sort of way. In a haunting, poignant, depressing sort of way. Why am I starting this article talking about the only book review I've posted to date?

Because sometimes, after I read or watch something great, I like to read 1-star reviews. I get a weird cathartic boost from it, and seeing ill-conceived criticisms of a brilliant book/show/movie makes me double down on my rabid fandom. For example, I’ve been told there are people who dislike the TV masterpiece “Breaking Bad.” I've never met one of these mythical beings, but I feel comfortable saying that they're all wrong. I feel the same way about “The Knife,” and apparently so does the Chicago Tribune, who hailed it as “a literary masterpiece.” After reading it, I was genuinely surprised to find that it had only 4/5 stars on most common review sites. I quickly figured out why it wasn’t averaging at least 4.5, and my blood started to boil. The common denominator on nearly every poor review was a lack of character development. “None of the five main characters changed!” “No character arcs!”

I get it. And in a way, they're right. The characters don't end up drastically different from when they started the novel. The quiet family man doesn't leave his wife and kids because of the horrors of war. The loudmouth pervert is still a loudmouth pervert. The stoic badass remains such throughout. But these people are missing the point, and it’s such a glaring oversight that I can’t tell whether I feel contempt or pity for them. It’s like going to a fine-dining Italian restaurant and giving them one star because they don’t serve sushi.

The Knife isn't about how these people change. The Knife is about who they already are. And the subtle shades of these characters are revealed bit-by-bit through hilarious and touching dialogue, thoughtful introspection, and the way they react in the most dangerous of situations. Layer by layer, the personalities of these characters are peeled back to reveal what lies at their core.

That's the type of character development nobody talks about. Not changing a character's personality, but revealing it.

Have you ever had someone pegged down pretty quickly after meeting them? Maybe you got to know them better, only to find that you knew nothing about them, and the person they truly are is far richer and more complex than you had initially thought.

Maybe they're the complete opposite of the person you thought they were. I have a close friend who is perhaps the kindest and most genuine person I know. The day we met, I was a newbie taking some pitifully inept swings at the heavy bag strung up in the corner of the local gym. He offered to “give me some pointers,” and proceeded to kick the shit out of me. Did I mention he also had about fifty pounds on me? Needless to say, I was not a fan, although he later proved many of my initial presumptions about him so very, very wrong. He didn't change much in the year that we became friends. I just learned who he truly was.

You can do the same with your characters. You can show the reader who they are through small glimpses into their past, their relationships, reactions to adversity or success, their habits, fears, the way they speak, how they approach conflict, and a hundred other small things they do on the page. There's no need to telegraph everything about a character in the first few minutes of meeting them. Let their personality be slowly revealed through their actions.

This, of course, can be interpreted as “show, don't tell,” but I would phrase it like this: Show more than you tell, but do both gradually.

When the character’s personality is unfurled, one endearing quirk or aggravating flaw at a time, it builds intimacy with the reader. They feel like they're getting to know the character just as they would a real person. Not every character will have an arc as drastic as Walter White's descent into Heisenberg. (Yeah, two references in one article. I'll aim for three on the next.) That's ok. Your character is fine. You're fine. Just show us who they are, one layer at a time, scene by scene. Let us discover what drives them, what they value, what they fear, hate, and love, what in their past made them this way and what they hope for the future.

I do this using three main methods:

Flashbacks

Hang on, put down the pitchforks. Yes, they can be poorly used to retcon lazy writing. Yes, when overused, they can be aggravating. I get it. But I still can't think of a better tool to delve into a character’s past and let the reader experience it in the same way the character experienced it. Narration? Sure, a two-sentence explanation of a past event works well. But if it's an impactful moment that shapes who your character is, good luck fitting all that context and nuance and emotion into a few lines of narrative text. Dialogue? You're veering dangerously close to “As you know, Bob,” territory. Flashbacks give an immediacy to the distant past, and that is a valuable and powerful tool at your fingertips. Just plan them well in advance, (both content and where they fit in the narrative structure), and know when not to use them. Also, try limiting flashbacks to one character if you're doing a recurring style (useful for breaking up large chunks of backstory). More than one character with multiple flashbacks gets messy, and you’re more likely to confuse and/or piss off the reader than enlighten them.

Introspection

People think about shit all the time. Their job, their significant other, what they want for lunch, their next doctor appointment, that cool new TV show. And sometimes, they think about themselves. Your characters can do this, too. After all, they have a place in the world, their community, their social circle, and their household. Sometimes, they're going to think about it. Or about what brought them there, things they like and dislike about themselves and others and their situation, what they want to change, what they fear or hope for. Everyone undergoes some level of self-scrutiny unless they have their head a mile up their own ass. (Actually, that could be a fun character to write.) So let the reader be privy to your character’s deepest reflections. Perhaps the reader will find they have more in common with the fearless warrior you wrote than they had initially thought, because deep down, he does fear for his own safety just like everyone else. Character introspection is a great way to let the reader get directly inside the character’s head and see their raw, unfiltered take on themselves and the world around them.

Conflicting pieces

Ok, so if your gentle, pacifist main character suddenly goes on a bloody rampage, you probably need to rethink things a bit. What I mean is that people aren't one-dimensional, and rarely is someone's personality uniform in every circumstance. I'm a personal trainer, so at work I have to be loud, energetic, positive, and friendly. For thirteen hours. Want to guess what I'm like at home? I make unconscious people look lively. There are a million examples of this. Many comedians, hilarious people whose careers revolve around laughter, suffer from depression. Dexter Holland, frontman for legendary punk band The Offspring, is a molecular biologist. He also makes a mean hot sauce. Think about the people you know. Maybe your friend that comes across as a selfish jerk on his first impression is actually a wonderful father. Maybe that five-foot-tall girl at your office with the bubbly personality knows Muay Thai. Personalities are incredibly complex, and all the facets that make up who someone is will rarely align with complete cohesion. You can use this to set up a reader's expectations about a character, and then surprise them with new information that rounds out and enriches the character. This will leave the reader feeling like they're still getting to know the character, which keeps them invested in their story.

Wrap-Up

I want to point out that character arcs are still very important. Not every character will change drastically, but a few of your characters should learn something, have their worldview challenged and changed, triumph, suffer, make mistakes and learn some more. But characters don't need a sweeping, four-piece arc to be interesting, likable, or relatable. They just need to have their personalities revealed throughout the story in an authentic and compelling way.

That is the other side of character development, and one that we should regard in equal standing with character transformation. Some of my favorite characters don't change much throughout the story, but as it progresses, I grow in my understanding and appreciation of them. When the final page turns, a reader won't care if your character’s personality flips 180 degrees or stays exactly the same, as long as they empathize with the character’s struggles and core drivers.

So make them empathize.

One page at a time.